Homoeopathy - quackary or a key to the future of medicine?

Authors

Peter W. Gold, National Centre for Homoeoapthy, 801 North Fairfax Street, Suite 306, Alexandria, VA 22314, Virginia, USA
S Novella, Yale University, New Haven CT, USA
R Roy, Pennsylvania State University part, P.A. USA.
D Marcus, Baylor University, Texas, USA
I Bell, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
N Davidovitch, Ben Gurion University, Israel
A Saine, Canadian Academy of Homoeopathy, Quebec, Canada

Keywords

homoeopathy

Article Type

Discussion

Abstract

This is an edited transcript of a debate held at the University of Connecticut Health Centre, Farmington, Connecticut, USA on 25 October 2007. Homoeopathy is a widely used but controversial form of complementary and alternative medicine. Six distinguished International speakers, including advocated and skeptics concerning homoeopathy, debated the plausibility, theoretical principles, clinical and basic research evidence, ethical and other issues surrounding homoeopathy.

Digital Object Identifier

10.53945/2320-7094.1841

Publisher

Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd.

How to cite this article

Gold PW, Novella S, Roy R, et al. Homoeopathy - quackary or a key to the future of medicine?. Indian J Res Homoeopathy 2008;2:1-6. doi: 10.53945/2320-7094.1841